AI Regulation? US Ring Leader Flushed Out by CHINA MASTER of the House of Cards!
Chuck, after your request to God’s Messenger did the Pope reply to Cisco with Matthew’s words:
“No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.”
Trumpster Clown, laying all your cards on table may look like a ‘Full House’ but you got a Straight Flush, lots of the same suited whores!
Rocket man and Chip man, key players, may be playing on your left & right Trumpster, but their wins come to me.
AI, Fintech and Drones and ‘The Future of Regulation’ were on the mind of Deloitte in 2018. Their ‘Principles for regulating emerging technologies’ included ‘Task force, right time, right approach…’
Of the AI “black box” problem they note ‘Decisions made by Algorithms.’
Problem? “Creators can’t explain how they work. Inability to see what’s inside an algorithm.”
AI Code Enforcer? A ‘food inspector’ really? They’re just too damn fast!
Bakul Patel calls it “pacing problem”:
“There’s a disconnect between the speed, iterative development and ubiquitous connected nature of digital health technologies and the existing regulatory structures and processes. The current regulatory approach is not well-suited to support that fast pace of development.”
2018 Maps of Regulatory sandboxes and Collaborative regulation speak for themselves.
UAE, still collaborating with Lebanon or do your ‘accords’ with Israel get in the way?
Deloitte concludes:
“As emerging technologies evolve, regulators from around the world are rethinking their approaches, adopting models that are agile, iterative, and collaborative to face the challenges posed by emerging technologies and the fourth Industrial Revolution. To promote innovation, regulators are also moving toward creating outcome-based regulations and testing new models in sandboxes.”
Bill Gates, permit me to correct you on two points:
►Regulating AI technology is not new
►Hacks, outages or ‘breaches’ did NOT start this year. Reached their peak in 2024. Ask Crowdstrike.
Bill, your professed concern of the future billion deaths overlooks the DEAD 80,000+ PALESTINIANS IN GAZA your Microsoft was complicit in.
AND those negatively affected by your NUCLEAR REACTOR PLANTS.
AI Upstarts looking for IPO? Is ‘Bubble’ a self-made conundrum or self-fulfilling prophecy?
In The Wealth of Nations and The Theory of Moral Sentiments, the argument is that:
“As the wealthy seek out goods and status that ultimately bring them little pleasure inadvertently end up promoting the good of the poor.”
But the joke is on users-humans-people. You’re being resold your own shit!
As it applies to AI good for the World, Economists who see this as Adam Smith’s “invisible hand” get the premise correct and conclusion very wrong.
These wealthy wretched worms hold a visible tight fist working in tandem to directly sink the poor deeper as their profits soar.
US, in your quest for AI supremacy over China, your AI contractors have killed Palestinians, Iranians, US soldiers and Citizens, children, Immigrants, Canadians, breached Australian Government… BUT NO DEAD CHINESE OR BREACHED PRC MILITARY.
Chuck, was your signature in the ‘Rome Call for AI ethics’ at the Vatican an exchange for a business or personal prayer?
Of course, responsible and ethical AI use is superseded by illegal use. Just as the spoils of War trump crimes on humanity.
If ‘confession is good for the soul’, lack of atonement embitters both the heart and mind. The 80,000+ dead Palestinians and Gazans need to rest in peace.
Chuck, if you got played a bad hand, will you be dealt a better one by the Vatican or ‘hand of God’?
Fear not, you walk not alone.
A circus led by a brainless Clown and his Crony AI Assistants are lining up to walk that tight rope.